Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph Orso's avatar

Thanks for this, Graham. It’s complex, provocative and shimmering with an old beauty. I went to the Holy Land once, and standing on the Temple Mount, an indescribable feeling rushed into me, causing me to think something like, “Ohhh, I see, this place actually is holy.” It’s not a metaphor in any way. My short visit there was one experience like that after another, in both directions. Coming down from that very literal hill of sacred experience, a rabbi interrupted our group to talk about bombs while a group of American Christians in pink shirts reading “Powerlifters for Jesus” cheered him on.

But I have to say, in my own prayer journey, even as I return to the Christ path, that place has not been central. After reading your essay, part of me sees this is just because I have never drank in these complicated, holy stories in the ways you and others have. I want to do that now. But there’s this line toward the end of your writing I keep wondering about: “I offer this only as a way to take seriously this land I don’t live in, but whose stories I’m trying to live by...” It strikes me that the tension in my own prayer journey is the opposite of this. I am trying to take seriously this land where I live (I know you are, too), meaning that I wonder about how it is also holy in particular ways – not metaphorical ways. I believe the land longs to be related with in these ways, or God longs to be related with in these ways through the land. And yet I can never live by this land’s stories because I don’t know them. The peoples who know the deep, sacred contours of this North American continent are not my ancestors, and the ancient stories that relay the actual, sacred Presence as it manifests in the land here are told completely outside the Christian or Hebraic cosmology. What to do about that, I don’t know. But your article has provoked a lot of interior wondering about it – and tension – so thank you.

Expand full comment
Avery Johnson's avatar

Graham, as usual, thanks for the thoughtful and passionate content.

One concept that's helped me navigate all this stuff personally is that Jesus actually becomes the bridge between the "Jew" (the visceral, the embodied, the concrete, the tangible) and the "Greek" (the ethereal, the philosophical, the abstract, the conceptual): that in following Christ, we can connect Heaven with Earth. He has healed this tension and prepared this reconnection, this rebinding (religion, re-attachment of ligaments) by undergoing the fullest intensity of animosity from both worlds, being suspended between heaven and earth, rejected by his Father and his Bride simultaneously.

I think that, since the enlightenment, the modern western world has lost touch with or failed to fully appreciate the importance of the truth of the Jewish life (the law and the prophets) and instead has a tendency to over-emphasize the Greek truth. I believe that a reintegration of the earthy and carnal principles of Judaism, without discarding the light and vision of the Greek principles, will truly be re-orienting for our culture and society: "I have not come to abolish the Law and the prophets, but to fulfill them".

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts