Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Kampf's avatar

Thank you Graham! It is always comforting to open my computer and see something new from you!

Part of the Sherard quote:

"The Christian’s own religiousness has become his chief preoccupation. And in this context the concept of the Christian’s responsibility for the fate of the world has inescapably lost all meaning."

It is difficult for me to express how important this quote is. I find it so very sobering.

====

Beyond all discussions of what Christianity is, what true worship is, what salvation is, of where history has lead the Church down rabbit holes, and, I suppose, discussions of Hellenism and Plato...beyond all this is the still small voice of the Creator.

====

The humanity we share with the Messiah...that is it. Yet we* (see below) have to debate, discuss, try to convince the other, instead of just being - just learning how to listen to the still small voice. To be Christian there are no words. There are no words. There is only giving. We cannot truly give of ourselves unless we experience a union of love with the Messiah, the Creator, the ruach ha-kodesh (the wind that carries the Peace that passes all understanding) . Even without this union we can begin to give of ourselves, though this union is (I feel) our natural state - a union with the one in which we are truly human (many of you thinkers and writers may be scoffing at my meager attempt to express the inexpressible. Thanks your for your patience).

-----

This desire for the wordless reason, this desire for our natural state that Jesus the Messiah is... presenting himself in silence, without our desire to explain or describe it, but just to receive... in silence.

Thank you Graham for allowing me to once again contemplate these things, and share a bit.

*(I'm not talking about this discussion here in the comments or in these essays)

Expand full comment
Sethu's avatar

Hey, thanks for the engagement here over the weekend, by the way; I enjoyed that and think that I understand what you're doing better now. In particular, I thought over what you said about being a "Tradition bearer" after having drunk deeply from the well of Orthodoxy. From my standpoint, that would seem to imply that you're trying to take Orthodoxy in a creative new direction, like Bulgakov with his Sophiology. But I can understand why you're framing it the way you are, in terms of your Oorts cloud vector.

Also, I was thinking about how one would go about distinguishing good groovy from bad groovy. I once ran into a pair of Presbyterian seminarians who made claims to the effect that Jesus was a bastard—and I'm pretty sure they thought they were being groovy. There's a similar problem with the contemporary rhetoric of "acceptance" and the woke plague. A great many people confuse the zeitgeist with the Holy Ghost, which seems to give Orthodox warnings about "obedience" a certain credence, even as that shouldn't be allowed to impede genuine inspiration.

Expand full comment
76 more comments...

No posts